Sign in

             | 

Young Leaders Collective

We, at Young Leaders Collective have two primary objectives, on one hand; we aim at building young leaders between the ages of 16 and 25; and on the other, creating a politically conscious youth.
click here to read more about us
The YLC Panel Discussion on the ‘Value of Student Unions in the Education System’

The YLC Panel Discussion on the ‘Value of Student Unions in the Education System’ was very fruit full. We had a total of 100 participants who were charged from started to end.

Justice Santosh Hegde, Mrs. Kanchan Kaur and Mr. P. G. R. Sindhia were of the opinion that Student Unions cannot function without political interference and this would eventually lead to the fall of the purpose of education. The lone voice of decent was Mr. Adinath Narde who pointed out that it is Student Unions that teach a student about governance and democracy not necessarily only politics.

The most concern was raised over the fact that student bodies will not be able to function without the interference of political parties.

Students in the audience bombarded the panelists with questions and statements about how colleges had decided that student’s were not to be consulted on issues concerning them and any attempt to voice their opinion was suppressed regardless of the situation. Students also pointed out that with the lack of student unions there is also a dearth of leadership that has become synonymous with politics.

It was pointed out that Institutions such as IISc, NLSIU and the IIM’s had active student bodies with yearly elections that ran perfectly well without the interference of political parties. And that this process actually bettered the productivity of students and the Institutions.

Over all, the student’s were unanimous in their need for an ‘A Political student body’.

“We want a forum to address our concerns.”

The Young Leaders Collective will be representing this voice to ensure that student representation becomes a reality.

Godspeed,

Madhukeshwar Desai,

 
The Value of Student Unions to the Education System in India

Young Leaders Collective is hosting a panel discussion on “The Value of Student Unions to the Education System in India”.

At 5 P. M. on 30th March 2010, at the Senate Hall, Central College, Bangalore.

The Panelists include


•  Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Santosh Hegde, Karnataka Lokayukta.
•  Mr. P. G. R. Sindhia, Karnataka Working President, Janata Dal (Secular).
•  Mr. Adinath Narde, Advocate, High Court of Karnataka.
•  Mrs. Kanchan Kaur, Vice Dean, Indian Institute of Journalism and New Media, Bangalore.
•  Mr. Madhav Kanoria, President, Student Bar Council, NLSIU.


The discussion shall be moderated by Mr. Priyotosh Khan, Principal, Jogesh Chandra Chaudhuri College, Kolkata.

Come voice your opinions.

 
The Doctor and the Vet.

‘Cyrus’ my three-year-old Great Dane falls ill often. We try different kinds of medication. Some work, some don’t.

I have been falling sick very often over the past 6 months as well.

Both of us refer to our respective ‘men of medicine’ but for some reason, even though my illness seems to be more severe, Cyrus’ seems to be more difficult to treat.  This is attributed to the fact that I have a voice and he doesn’t.

Education in India today, particularly Bangalore, suffers from the ‘Cyrus Syndrome’ where students cannot voice their problems. So the question that confronts us is whether this is symptomatic of all educational institutes all over the country?

No. Bangalore is different, because here we have a ban on Student activism in educational institutes.

In my opinion – it was the right law to be passed in its stated intention, but, as has been seen in various instances before, the legislation has led to more unintended consequences than foreseen.  Bangalore has some of the finest educational institutions and bringing politics into the campus is definitely not going to create a conducive environment to study.

But the result of this has been that all students now suffer from ‘Cyrus syndrome.’ We cannot communicate, effectively to the management, what we need and want and vice a versa.

Let’s take an example – Most colleges today have compulsory attendance of 85%.

Right, fair enough. We are paying for education – let’s sit in the classroom.

In the legal field, the only way to assure ones self of a job, is by working with your prospective employers for a considerable period of time, to be able to impress them. The college has stipulated a time table which takes the entire working day – 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. This means, I cannot intern during the semester.

So, getting that required attendance becomes very difficult, if I want to work in order to secure my future.  Especially, at the beginning of the semester, the laws of percentages play cruel games on students.

The college’s requirement is clear – You must be in class 85% of the time and figure a way to balance your academics and other activities.

If I as a lone student were to go and question the management, I would certainly be side tracked, with a bull’s eye painted on my head. Being a good friend, I wouldn’t want to paint that bull’s eye on my friends and take them along to show solidarity. And my enemies would smell the paint a mile away.

So, WHAT DO I DO? I manage. “Swalpa adjust maadi” as the lingo goes. But how is this furthering education, knowledge or learning? This was just one, simple, non-life threatening example. There are a lot more serious situations that go unheard.

WHAT SHOULD WE DO? Bring back Student unions and pray that our lecturers don’t fall like dominos suffering from heart attacks? NO, definitely not.  The answer is very simple.

‘A political student units’ in every college with a proper structure and fair elections.

The benefit of this is two fold:

  • The management get’s to communicate effectively its thoughts, and the students get to express their opinions on the new policy, effectively. No more ‘Cyrus syndrome’
  • Some of the greatest leaders our country has seen were student leaders. This way we bring governance and not politics back into the education system. Where by students understand how systems work and how to balance to it with education.



Educational institutions are places for learning. Not a manufacturing line that produces certificates.

Globally acclaimed Universities, like Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard have actively encouraged student units and student interest groups. These have produced, just to mention a few – Late Mrs. Benazir Bhutto - Former Prime minister of Pakistan, late Mr. Jyoti Basu – Longest serving elected head of a democratic state and Barrack Obama – President of the United States of America.

We have fought hard for the democracy we enjoy in our country. Why not allow that democracy in educational institutions?

Madhukeshwar Desai.

 
Young Leaders Collective

We, at Young Leaders Collective have two primary objectives, on one hand; we aim at building young leaders between the ages of 16 and 25; and on the other, creating a politically conscious youth.



Young Leaders Collective presents "The History of Indian Politics" from Young Leaders Collective on Vimeo.

 

 

Gallery

Madhukeshwar Desai, President of YLC presiding of the first ylc conference. The confernce was organised at Chowdiah Memorial Hall on 17th of November 2009.








Mr. Krishna Byre Gowda, the current MLA of the Byatarayanapura constituency speaking on how it is imperative to work with the system.